Skip to main content

What's wrong with the modern view of objective-oriented, competency-based education?

The tremendous amount of progress toward an improved educational system in the U.S. over the past few years is amazing. A movement is now in place to define education based on valued outcomes or objectives. Objectives, of course, are not new to the 21st century. They've been around in public education for many decades. What's new is the increased accountability and ownership that has begun to spread very quickly into all K-12 public institutions. The result is increased awareness of what should be taught, and what kids should be learning. However, there is still a big missing piece. Educational content production is objective-focused---meaning content is created in alignment with a specific objective, or set of objectives. This is good for educational practitioners who need to assess student ability at a given level of expected competency, but not helpful for a student who does not have the prerequisite knowledge or skill for content aligned to a given objective to be meaningful or digestible. The next step toward an improved educational experience is to start creating content that is developed on a foundation of connected learning progress pathways that specify not only competencies at a given point, but describe the complete sequence of progressive attainments necessary to ascend the path.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Learning Environment

The learning environment can be one or both of the following: 1) Content providing: e.g. other skiers provide good and bad examples, mountain provides visual input to understand skiing (compared to talking about skiiing in a classroom, chalkboard drawings, pictures, video, etc...) 2) Performance enabling: e.g. the mountain, snow, a ski lift, provide a place to ski; skis, boots and poles provide equipment to ski. e.g. a harness can help a diver safely learn a new dive, e.g. a foam pit can help a gymnast safely learn a new move
Post a Comment
Read more

James Paul Gee's 36 principls of learning from What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy

In his book, What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy , James Paul Gee identifies 36 principles of learning: Active, Critical Learning principle All aspects of the learning environment (including the ways in which the semiotic domain is designed and presented) are set up to encourage active and critical, not passive, learning. Design Principle Learning about and coming to appreciate design and design principles is core to the learning experience. Semiotic Principle Learning about and coming to appreciate interrelations within and across multiple sign systems (images, words, actions, symbols, artifacts, etc) as a complex system is core to the learning experience. Semiotic Domains Principle Learning involves mastering, at some level, semiotic domains, and being able to participate, at some level, in the affinity group or groups connected to them. Metalevel Thinking about Semiotic Domains Principle Learning involves active and cr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Trait vs state

"A useful distinction in the discussion of student characteristics is trait versus state. Traits are student characteristics that are relatively constant over time...whereas states are student characteristics that tend to vary during individual learning experiences, such as level of content-specific knowledge." (Reigeluth, 1983, p. 32) Reigeluth also states that "many strategy components have been shown to help students with all kinds of traits to learn" [p. 32]. My position is that we do not know a priori which aspects of our instructional strategies, learning environment, motivator, etc... will generalize across many or all students. However, with a localized learning theory we can learn over time which do and which do not. At the same time, we will likely find ways of grouping students that we never would have before imagined.
Post a Comment
Read more