Skip to main content

References

Aronson, D. T., & Briggs, L. J. (1983). Contributions of Gagneì and Briggs to a prescriptive model of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of the current status (Vol. 1, pp. 75-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Boggs, L. P. (1907). "The Psychology of the Learning Process." The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 4(18): 477-481.

Bunderson, C. V. (2003). How to build a domain theory: On the validity centered design of construct-linked scales of learning and growth (pdf). In M. Wilson (Ed.), Objective Measurement: Theory into Practice: Ablex Publishing Co. (PDF available online at: http://www.edumetrics.org/papers/How_to_build_a_Domain_Theor.pdf)

Calkins, M. W. (1907). Psychology: What is it About? The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 4(25), 673-683.

Clark, D. R. (2008), A Time Capsule of Training and Learning. Retrieved February 5, 2008 from http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/history/history2.html

Freeman, J. (1813). A method of teaching adult persons to read ... and which is likewise adapted to the circumstances of those uninstructed children whose opportunities of learning to read are very precarious [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 28 February 2008, from The Making of the Modern World Database. London:Thomson Gale.

Gropper, G. (1983). A metatheory of instruction: A framework for analyzing and evaluating instructional theories and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of the current status (Vol. 1, pp. 37-54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kelly, G. A. (1963). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Landa, L. N. (1983). Descriptive and prescriptive. theories of learning and instruction: An analysis. of their relationships and interactions. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of the current status (Vol. 1, pp. 55-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Miner, B. G. (1904). The Changing Attitude of American Universities Toward Psychology. Science, 20(505), 299-307.

Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design: What is it and why is it? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Learning Environment

The learning environment can be one or both of the following: 1) Content providing: e.g. other skiers provide good and bad examples, mountain provides visual input to understand skiing (compared to talking about skiiing in a classroom, chalkboard drawings, pictures, video, etc...) 2) Performance enabling: e.g. the mountain, snow, a ski lift, provide a place to ski; skis, boots and poles provide equipment to ski. e.g. a harness can help a diver safely learn a new dive, e.g. a foam pit can help a gymnast safely learn a new move
Post a Comment
Read more

James Paul Gee's 36 principls of learning from What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy

In his book, What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy , James Paul Gee identifies 36 principles of learning: Active, Critical Learning principle All aspects of the learning environment (including the ways in which the semiotic domain is designed and presented) are set up to encourage active and critical, not passive, learning. Design Principle Learning about and coming to appreciate design and design principles is core to the learning experience. Semiotic Principle Learning about and coming to appreciate interrelations within and across multiple sign systems (images, words, actions, symbols, artifacts, etc) as a complex system is core to the learning experience. Semiotic Domains Principle Learning involves mastering, at some level, semiotic domains, and being able to participate, at some level, in the affinity group or groups connected to them. Metalevel Thinking about Semiotic Domains Principle Learning involves active and cr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Trait vs state

"A useful distinction in the discussion of student characteristics is trait versus state. Traits are student characteristics that are relatively constant over time...whereas states are student characteristics that tend to vary during individual learning experiences, such as level of content-specific knowledge." (Reigeluth, 1983, p. 32) Reigeluth also states that "many strategy components have been shown to help students with all kinds of traits to learn" [p. 32]. My position is that we do not know a priori which aspects of our instructional strategies, learning environment, motivator, etc... will generalize across many or all students. However, with a localized learning theory we can learn over time which do and which do not. At the same time, we will likely find ways of grouping students that we never would have before imagined.
Post a Comment
Read more