Skip to main content

References

Aronson, D. T., & Briggs, L. J. (1983). Contributions of Gagneì and Briggs to a prescriptive model of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of the current status (Vol. 1, pp. 75-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Boggs, L. P. (1907). "The Psychology of the Learning Process." The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 4(18): 477-481.

Bunderson, C. V. (2003). How to build a domain theory: On the validity centered design of construct-linked scales of learning and growth (pdf). In M. Wilson (Ed.), Objective Measurement: Theory into Practice: Ablex Publishing Co. (PDF available online at: http://www.edumetrics.org/papers/How_to_build_a_Domain_Theor.pdf)

Calkins, M. W. (1907). Psychology: What is it About? The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 4(25), 673-683.

Clark, D. R. (2008), A Time Capsule of Training and Learning. Retrieved February 5, 2008 from http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/history/history2.html

Freeman, J. (1813). A method of teaching adult persons to read ... and which is likewise adapted to the circumstances of those uninstructed children whose opportunities of learning to read are very precarious [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 28 February 2008, from The Making of the Modern World Database. London:Thomson Gale.

Gropper, G. (1983). A metatheory of instruction: A framework for analyzing and evaluating instructional theories and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of the current status (Vol. 1, pp. 37-54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kelly, G. A. (1963). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Landa, L. N. (1983). Descriptive and prescriptive. theories of learning and instruction: An analysis. of their relationships and interactions. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of the current status (Vol. 1, pp. 55-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Miner, B. G. (1904). The Changing Attitude of American Universities Toward Psychology. Science, 20(505), 299-307.

Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design: What is it and why is it? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Controversy over Instructional-design theory

"There has been some controversy over the useful breadth of instructional-design theory. Richard Snow is well known for his work on individual differences under the rubric of ATI, or aptitude-treatment interactions...ATI is a metatheory that in effect states that theories of instruction should prescribe methods (called treatments ) on the basis of student characteristics (called aptitudes ), because the effectiveness of those methods varies depending on student characteristics. Snow (1977) has stated that ATI (aptitude-treatment interaction) 'makes general theory impossible [p. 12]'---that instructional-design theories must be narrow and local to be of value. On the other hand, Scandura (1977) represented the view of many when he stated that instructional-design theories must be broad and comprehensive to be useful." (Reigeluth, 1983, p. 31-32) Reigeluth sias the different of opinion can be traced to a focus on management vs organizational strategies.
Post a Comment
Read more

James Paul Gee's 36 principls of learning from What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy

In his book, What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy , James Paul Gee identifies 36 principles of learning: Active, Critical Learning principle All aspects of the learning environment (including the ways in which the semiotic domain is designed and presented) are set up to encourage active and critical, not passive, learning. Design Principle Learning about and coming to appreciate design and design principles is core to the learning experience. Semiotic Principle Learning about and coming to appreciate interrelations within and across multiple sign systems (images, words, actions, symbols, artifacts, etc) as a complex system is core to the learning experience. Semiotic Domains Principle Learning involves mastering, at some level, semiotic domains, and being able to participate, at some level, in the affinity group or groups connected to them. Metalevel Thinking about Semiotic Domains Principle Learning involves active and cr...
Post a Comment
Read more